At the time, and even more so 39 years later, many people -- Catholic and otherwise -- are shocked that at precisely a time when the winds of change were gale force, the Bride of Jesus Christ vowed that she would cling to such an allegedly antediluvian view of sexual morality.
I first read Humanae Vitae ten years ago, during my sophomore year in college. I was prompted to do so because at the time, I had issues with the Church's teaching against contraception. I had always been strongly against abortion, but I also believed that birth control could be helpful to the pro-life movement's goal of eradicating abortion.
(That, and I gullibly believed that "overpopulation" was a problem. Thanks be to God, I soon thereafter discovered that this hand-wringing, gloom-and-doom nonsense was just that. I also had yet to discover G. K. Chesterston, who, in characteristic wit, managed in one sentence to expose the insanity of the Chicken Littles who seriously believe that "overpopulation" is somehow causing the sky to fall: "The answer to anyone who talks about the surplus population is to ask him whether he is the surplus population, or if he is not, how he knows he is not.")
When I first HV, I was blown away. First, at how succinct Paul VI was.
Second, at how right he was. And is. And continues to be.
The thing that most people seem to remember most about HV is the series of predictions Paul VI made about the grave consequences that would inevitably result from an increasing reliance on contraception:
Responsible men can become more deeply convinced of the truth of the doctrine laid down by the Church on this issue if they reflect on the consequences of methods and plans for artificial birth control. Let them first consider how easily this course of action could open wide the way for marital infidelity...
All other things being equal, it doesn't take much grey matter to realize that convenient, widespread access to contraception has made it easier to commit adultery.
...and a general lowering of moral standards. Not much experience is needed to be fully aware of human weakness and to understand that human beings —- and especially the young, who are so exposed to temptation—need incentives to keep the moral law, and it is an evil thing to make it easy for them to break that law.
As for coming up with examples testifying to the general lowering of moral standards in the last two generations, it's hard to know where to start -- all the more reason why Paul VI was right when he made this prediction.
Another effect that gives cause for alarm is that a man who grows accustomed to the use of contraceptive methods may forget the reverence due to a woman, and, disregarding her physical and emotional equilibrium, reduce her to being a mere instrument for the satisfaction of his own desires, no longer considering her as his partner whom he should surround with care and affection.
Interesting, isn't it, that just as our culture is now awash in contraception, we are also awash in p*rnography -- and increasingly hard-core p*rnography, at that.
Finally, careful consideration should be given to the danger of this power passing into the hands of those public authorities who care little for the precepts of the moral law. Who will blame a government which in its attempt to resolve the problems affecting an entire country resorts to the same measures as are regarded as lawful by married people in the solution of a particular family difficulty? Who will prevent public authorities from favoring those contraceptive methods which they consider more effective? Should they regard this as necessary, they may even impose their use on everyone...
And, indeed, many have. China is probably the most notorious, but it's hardly alone. Indeed, forced contraception, sterilization, and abortion are the norm in many parts of the world.
Limits to Man's Power
Consequently, unless we are willing that the responsibility of procreating life should be left to the arbitrary decision of men, we must accept that there are certain limits, beyond which it is wrong to go, to the power of man over his own body and its natural functions—limits, let it be said, which no one, whether as a private individual or as a public authority, can lawfully exceed. These limits are expressly imposed because of the reverence due to the whole human organism and its natural functions...
Paul VI rightly recognized that contraception would pave the way for public acceptance of such evils as in-vitro fertilization and, more recently, human cloning.
Without a doubt, nearly two generations later, Humanae Vitae has proven to be prophetic.
(Cross-posted at Catholic Dads ... this post originally appeared in slightly modified form on 25 July 2006 on the Generations for Life blog)